Saturday, October 31, 2009

Essay 1 Draft 2

            Dave was big and friendly. I’d met him my freshman year of high school, after my family moved to Illinois. Two years earlier, my family had moved from New Jersey to the suburbs of Chicago, and I’d been forced to make new friends. Then, for reasons I don’t really remember, my parents decided I should go to a high school that none of my grade school friends were going to- including a girl who I really though I liked. I was forced to remake all my friends for the second year in a row.
            I probably wouldn’t have met Dave if it weren’t for his excellent, outgoing personality. I was sitting alone in graphics and design class when he first approached me, and asked me if I played Magic cards- something he’d asked everyone the first day of school. I didn’t know much about Magic, but I pretended to be a fan because I was lonely. Immediately, we hit it off.
At the time, we were both kind of outcasts. I was new, and had a speech impediment that made it impossible for me to tell people things like what town I was from. Dave had been around for awhile, but was overweight and definitely self-conscious about it. As the year progressed, we learned that we shared a plethora of nerdy interests.
We talked about videogames, rock bands and girls, and complained about why girls weren’t paying attention to us. Then, one day Dave met the girl of his dreams.
To put it nicely, the girl was out of our leagues. She was cute, and had the dark, gothic metal-chick edge that made the combo of our nerdy-ness and puberty go crazy. Dave talked to her quite a bit more than I did- at that point, I was still too nervous about my own speaking to do any talking myself.
I lived vicariously through the conversations Dave would have with her. As expected, things weren’t going well for him by way of a relationship. But Dave did tell me the short lists of things that this girl was attracted to- she’d told him, apparently, meaning he asked. They were: “Awkward” guys, guys who “had problems,” guys who were “punk,” and guys who had “been through things.”
Poor Dave. She was giving him the roundabout, telling him she liked guys who fit impossible descriptions when the honest her would have said “guys that I look at and am attracted to because they’re good looking and don’t treat me like crap.”
Unfortunately for Dave, his conversations with her led him to a whole new level of rigorous soul-searching. He decided that he needed to be that guy who “had problems” and “been through things.” A day later, he confessed to me that he was thinking about trying marijuana, and that he didn’t believe in god anymore. He also confessed to me that he always “thought” he “might have been abused when he was younger.”
Dave just wasn’t getting it. He and I were already the social misfits of high school, but he was driving himself nuts trying to figure out why he wasn’t “different” and “edgy” enough for this particular girl. She didn’t really want that, but for some reason he couldn’t fathom, it’s what he thought he needed to be.

As someone who aspires to be a writer-of-sorts, I constantly find myself in trying to fill the same shoes Dave was trying to fill. All writers seem to have that in common- we feel that we have a “voice” and that there’s something we should be saying, but all-to-often our own experience doesn’t seem to do much in the way for our “being distinct.” And, of course, to be different is to be noticed.
            Other writers have been through pain they don’t need to invent:
           
When I was younger, my best friend's dad had a drinking problem. Though he was never hit by his dad, he constantly felt like he was being verbally abused, unable to meet the expectations of that person. Resentment for his father grew and grew, until he dropped out of college and moved out of the house at the age of nineteen.
            Though their relationship is now probably better than it's ever been, his perception of his father has traditionally been a negative one. He sees his father as a unfaithful boozer, an opportunist, an abuser and is tormented by his memory of him daily.
            I see his father as I see my own, an imperfect, old fashioned human being who has made tons of mistakes, but nearly always attempts to do the “right thing” if not right away then at least eventually.
               Sometimes, though, I feel that I should dig up his or some other poor soul's torment, and make it my own. Sometimes, I feel that if I had a little bit more sensational of a life than my own real experience, I’d have a better shot at being a writer.  Or I’d have a better shot if I did something interesting, like joined the army. That’d definitely make my voice more interesting.

            By the time I made it to college, though, I’d given up on the dream of being the most interested man in the world. Larger than life adventures and deep-seeded psychological problem ceased to be what I wanted to write or hear about. I turned to Journalism, because that’s what described real people, living real honest life.
            I started writing for the independent paper- the real “objective voice of the students.” The paper that was designed and created to be an alternative to the school’s newsletter and the Communication department’s paper. The paper was about what the students were all about. My kind of paper, you know?
            But even during my short tenure there I had problems. When the election system our student government uses broke down, I hesitantly stood by as the paper printed as its front page headline (with semantic accuracy only obtainable by English majors) “Student Org fixes Election,” “fixes” being the keyword. Things like that were happening every issue, too. Then, it was becoming harder and harder for me to get published. The editors kept telling me that my stories “weren’t interesting enough” and that I should write about other things, like the protest that the faculty union was having. Issue by issue, my articles weren’t making it while the ones that pushed the limit were. I was supposed to be a Muckraker, or nothing at all.

             I’m leaving college now, my creative writing degree in tow. After four years, I still haven’t found my voice, or what makes me distinct, or how I’m going to find something to entertain the world of readers. It seems more and more like although everyone likes talking guys like Dave, no one really wants to be with them.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

A Photo



I don't have a physical photo album here or at home, and I nowhere close to my mom's or grandmom's collections, so I'm forced to glean from tagged photos of me on Facebook.

This picture of Kenny and I playing Rock Band was taken by either my girlfriend Casey or Kenny's ex, Larissa on New Year's Eve. As background, I played music in bands pretty much all through high school and even a little bit in college, but eventually I became way too busy for it. I still play guitar (sometimes) but it's nowhere near the level I was at before my Freshman year.  I wonder how much "skill" I have left?

I was listening to some of my favorite metal albums for the last prompt, and it occurred to me how much the "good" music I know and love has been missing from my life. I really feel like I need to start playing in a band again, if not to make actual music to cover my favorite tunes and feel the camaraderie of being in a band again.

This picture, taken less than a year ago on a New Year's Eve, sums up best where I am in my musical life- drunk, singing, and playing rock band with people who have absolutely no idea how music is played. Sorry, Kenny.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Remembering Awake: Dreams of My Favorite Album (blog13)



Here in the dorms at college, I don't have a lot of physical objects from my past. Most of that kind of stuff is in my room somewhere, in boxes or collecting dust. So, for this blog entry, I didn't have whole lot of things to look at. I wound up going through my media library and looking at some of my music instead. Dream Theater's Awake immediately struck me as something I should write about.

Anyone who knows me and has been friends with me for some time know that my favorite band of all time is Dream Theater. It has been this way for many years, for at least half of high school and all of college. Dream Theater are my favorite band. I saw them twice this summer. No other band comes half as close as they do to my heart.

"Awake" was my first Dream Theater album. I bought it when I was in high school. Though I was incredibly obsessed with another band, Tool, at the time, I'd been told by many people on the internet that Tool weren't the rock band with the best musicians- Dream Theater were. At first, I couldn't believe it. Then, I bought "Awake" and I was convinced:

People on the internet are full of it!

Needless to say, it really took a long time for "Awake" to click with me. During my first listen, so many things stuck out like a sore thumb. The repeating samples over the first track, 6:00:

6 o'clock on a Christmas morning
6 o'clock on a Christmas morning
6 o'clock on a Christmas morning
And for what?

And then;

Well isn't it for the honor of God, Aunt Kate?
I know all about the honor of God, Mary Jane!

I'd learn later that the samples were a direct reference to James Joyce's "The Dead," and the theme of an artist struggling with the imagined futility of his own artistic expression an important one.

While I liked the next song, Caught in a Web, quite a bit, the next song, Innocence Faded, impressed me with it's Rush-ness but I hated the confusing lyrics.

Callous and vain, fixed like a fossil
shrouding pain, passionless stage
distant like brothers
wearing apathetic displays
sharing flesh like living in cages
condescending, not intending to end.


It wasn't until later, when I talked to some people online, that I realized just how deep "Innocence Faded" was, especially in the context of that album's "artist" theme. In fact, during the time of recording, the keyboardists and guitarist were not getting along. The guitarist wrote "Innocence Faded" as a reaction to keyboardist and childhood friend Kevin Moore's increasing social and artistic seclusion. The two may have begun competing with one another in healthy ways- condescendingly, two figures who used to be as close as brothers now beyond the point of caring, sharing a "passionless stage" with one another every night.

The instrumental, Erotomania, impressed me with it's guitar and keyboard parts, but the next song, Voices, is where I really started liking the album. Not only the lyrics, but the music too. I think the song speaks for itself. I had the opportunity to hear Dream Theater perform "Voices" live twice, flawlessly, this summer, and it is a song that I hope they play at every show. The Silent Man, which concludes the three-part suite, is a nice acoustic change of pace and I love it's thought provoking lyrics.

A question well-served
is silence like a fever?
A voice never heard?
Or a message with no reciever?
Pray they won't ask
behind the stained-glass.
There's always one more mask.


Has man been a victim of his woman?
Of his father?
If he elects not to bother
will he suffocate their faith?
Desperate to fall
behind the great wall
that separates us all.


The next duo of songs, The Mirror and Lie, never really stuck out, and still don't, though Lie is growing on me and hearing them is fantastic live. The lyrics compliment one another, though, the first dealing with lying to one's self about addiction and the second dealing with a relationship built on a falsehood. Musically, the songs contain a variety of themes which seem to be revisited elsewhere in the album. Moore's piano in The Mirror is echoed later, in Space-Dye Vest.

The Mirror & Lie are a heavy, balls-to-the-walls storm that happens to be the centerpiece of the album. The next song, Lifting Shadows off a Dream, is an ambient but equally as lyrically heavy change of pace. Like all the songs on the album, the lyrics deal with a disconnect between people that either does or doesn't get resolved. This time, bassist John Myung uses his only lyrical contribution on the album to present us with the nature of male/female relationships.

He seems alone and silent,
thoughts remain without an answer.
Afraid and uninvited,
he slowly drifts away.
Moved by desire and fear-
breaking delicate wings-
Lifting Shadows off a Dream once broken...
She can turn a drop of water into an ocean.


Next, we have Scarred. What can I say about Scarred? Nothing that can't be heard by listening to the album, I think. Again, the theme of distance is prevalent.

Do you feel you don't know me anymore?
Do you feel I'm afraid of your love?
And how come you don't want me asking
and how come my heart's not invited?
You say you want everyone happy.
We're not laughing.


And how come you don't understand me?
And how come I don't understand you?
Thirty years say we're in this together
so open you eyes!
People in prayer for me, everyone there for me
sometimes I feel I can't face this alone.
My soul's exposed, it calms me to know that I won't.


But also thinly hidden in Scarred is guitarist John Petrucci's next message to Keyboardist Kevin Moore. Again, as we saw earlier in Innocence Faded, Petrucci seems to be addressing a life-long friendship that is being torn apart. Petrucci's song ends "I'm inspired and content," while Kevin's song which closes the album, Space-Dye Vest, ends with the lyricist rushing into complete isolation, "I'll never be opened again."

I hated Awake at first, but there's so much depth to it. So much to listen to and think about. In retrospect, Awake is now one of my favorite Dream Theater albums. I know most people won't, but I do hope some people look at some of the links to these songs (live boots mostly because of copyright issues) and maybe wind up liking Awake as much as I do.

Revisions, revisions, revisions, (blog 12)

I dropped the ball on my conference, so I'm not sure yet what essay I'm going to revise. Right now, though, I'm leaning towards the second essay. While I think the first album is more interesting, it lacks a lot of the "focus" that the second one has. Also, I think the second is more reflective of the place I'm at in my life now. If I don't finish that one soon, I'm not sure their will ever be a time when I can't finish.

I tried measuring the pro's and con's of both. The first essay offers a unique perspective that really could be explored more. However, it really would require quite a bit of heavy revision. The second essay isn't as unique as the first, but it is much closer to a final product that the first one. The first essay may require me to go and do some new research- the second does it. I'm afraid of rushing the first one and coming out with an inferior project.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

2nd Essay- The Working Class College Experience

I’m a little embarrassed to say this, but I spent a lot of the summer before my freshman year of college watching Gilmore Girls. It wasn’t out of choice, because reruns of the show were filling a daytime TV slot, and I was working a 2pm -10pm shift at Staples. I could only hang out with my girlfriend in the morning hours, and unfortunately she was even less willing to watch Walker: Texas Ranger than I was to watch Gilmore.

I remember Rory’s academic asspirations in stark contrast to my own. Rory, a lowly prep high school student who doesn’t belong, had dreams to attend Harvard, but wound up having to choose between her two fallbacks- Princeton and Yale. At that point in my life, I was still looking for the college that was the closest to my house while “still kind of far away.”

I don’t recall very much about Rory’s academic life- the show kind of lost its thunder for me after she made it into school- but I do remember her bearing witness to arguments about moral relativism as early as her first visit on campus, ordering food from hotdog stands named “Dante’s Inferno,” and getting excited about a set of the Oxford-English Dictionary.

My state university, by and large a working class commuter school, doesn’t have a philosophy department. No one from off campus tries to sell food at our around here. And you can’t find an Oxford-English Dictionary for sale at the bookstore.

I’m proud to have gone to my University, and so are my parents and everyone else. I’m the first person in my family to graduate. I have Aunts and Uncles who did, but neither my Mom or Dad or their grandparents went to college. They’re excited for me about graduating, even more than I am. We talk about it all the time.

“I’m nervous,” I’ll tell me my mom. “I don’t think I’m going to be able to get a job.”

“Joe,” she say, “You have your college degree. You’ll be able to get a job.”

But when I’m back on campus, everyone seems to have the same concerns that I do. I’ve met so many students who are training to be educators, or public administrators, or managers. I’ve met a fairly large amount of students who want to go to graduate school and be scholars, too. But, mostly, at my University, I’ve met a lot of teachers.

I wonder how many people graduate with Teaching Certification every year? Are there really that many teaching positions open? What about positions for public administrators? Store managers? In this economy?

My friends and I all come from the same types of families. I’d say most of those among us who aren’t geniuses wouldn’t be able to go to Universities if it weren’t for ones like my own, which stress affordability and cater to students many of whom work full time jobs. My girlfriend’s room mate, for instance, a child of a single parent, works two part time jobs over the weekend- one at night and one during the day. Another friend of mine, a coworker, is a double major but works with on campus and works 20 hours over Friday, Saturday, and Sunday nights off campus.

No one at my school really has time to sit in the café and talk politics or religion or philosophy or literature or art. I’m about the graduate, and I’m not really sure if any of my friends are interested. Whose fault is that, anyway?

Outside of certain circles, there’s no real strong intellectual interest here. College used to be a place where people who were interested in scholarly things went, and I’m not sure what went wrong about my particular University. I’m sure me and my peers are just as hard working and deserving of a college education as the college students of the past, so what’s different about us? Most likely, they’ll go through the course guideline, get their degree, and apply for some kind of job where they’ll never use the skills they supposedly did in college. That is, except for the ones who actually get those teaching jobs.

So who’s to blame for the overall “dumbing down” of the college experience? One time a professor of mine, an adjunct who does legal work, told me that the college experience was being ruined by democrats and liberals who insisted that a college education become something everyone can afford. In other words, college was becoming less important because the floodgates were open to all the working class- me and my peers, essentially.

I think it’s something deeper than resentment echoing from the elite. I think that maybe, a long time ago, someone decided that the people who belong in scholarly environments are those who can afford to be there. That has never been the case, but as a result, the market competitively moved to cater to more customers. Now that the task has been completed and there’s few people who aren’t going to college, college as-it-is has turned into a less than ideal place everyone needs to go to, but no one really belongs. It’s not just my University: This is the college experience that the working class has inherited.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

College, Getting a Job, and the American Dream in the 21st Century (This is Blog 10)

When I was in high school, I fell in love with Plato.

In retrospect it was probably because many of the other students in my intro to Philosophy class didn't like him, and I used to have this obsession with trying to "be different," but in my defense I've always been interested in politics and philosophy. And though I'm not politically savvy now and was even less so then, it was really no mystery to the eighteen year old me that we live in a muddled mess, and I found Plato's mystic alternative to be fascinating, to say the least.

I didn't care at all about school before my senior year of high school, and initially rejected my parents wishes for me to go away to a university. But my father, a truck driver, and my mother, who works in special needs, and my growing fascination with Plato ultimately convinced me that college was the right thing to do. So I went.

Though I was leaving behind a year-long high school relationship, a rock band, and all of my friends, college seemed like a pretty good place. There'd be people reading Shakespeare under the trees, or arguing about relativism at the lunch table. I'd be part of a new, unique "voice of the future," representing the first generation of working class people going to college, as my alma mater's president liked to say.

Unfortunately, when I finally moved in freshman year, I discovered that there wasn't a whole lot of that going on. Though there was plenty of people around, most couldn't be bothered to talk about deep questions. I did wind up joining a few politically based groups, but attendance was low. It seemed like everyone on campus was busy actually working between their classes. Where they doing? What else could be more important that scholastics?

A couple years in, and I'd resigned myself to the fact that that's just how college is. The humanities, I told myself, aren't important as they once were. It was evident by all of my peers, who showed little interest in academics, and where preparing to teach middle school or manage business.

I stayed firm with the scholastics, though. I gave all my projects 100 percent, and tried to learn about new things whenever I could. I borrowed books from the dusty old library, and made it a point to connect through the mist with the few dim lights of the other students like myself.

I told myself that people where the problem. People don't care! I thought. But I do. That's what makes me different. What makes me special.

Still, I was frustrated. I noticed other professors seemed frustrated, too, about the direction the administration was taking. I, who originally considered majoring in philosophy, and several of my professors where at a loss for words we when learned that the school's administration would be cutting the department. How can you have a university without a philosophy department? I remembered what my University's president had said about us being the "future" of college.

"Look around," he said once, at a special staff gathering (I worked as a Resident Assistant I the dorms) "What you see here is the future. In ten or twenty years, almost every university in the state is going to be like us."

Me and my peers, he reminded us, where some of the first in our families to go to college.

I couldn't be so optimistic, though. Something about the lack of interest in making college anything more than a degree factory bothered me. Then, one day, I met the alternative.

Because the administration was do determined at branching out and offering more courses than ever, I wound up having a lot of adjuncts and un-tenured professors, even in my 3000 and 4000 level classes.

One professor, and adjunct who also did legal work, told me and a few classmates after class that most of the students at my school "didn't belong to be in college."

"We just let everyone in, and as a result college has been dumbed down." he said.

I remember asking him if he was trying to tell me that I shouldn't be in college, but he denied that.

"You should be somewhere else, Joe." he said. "Why don't you apply at Rutgers, or somewhere out of state? Go Ivy league."

But he was wrong. I tried to explain to him that though my parents weren't poor, they could afford to pay the bill for my school, but any University that would've been a significant step up as a place of scholarship would be much more expensive. He never seemed to hear that, but before the course of the semester was over he made it a point to reiterate the same message to me, over and over again.

"You belong somewhere else."

Me and my peers are the first to go to college in our families. I don't know if we'll get jobs when we leave here. It just seems like there's so many of us. How could we possibly all be teachers next year? I've been lucky, because I never viewed my education as something strictly and have had a number of wonderful professors who've pointed me in various direction for my graduate studies.

But my university president is right. Around the nation, places like this are the first of their kind. Children of the world's remaining working class families can train for white-collar jobs, and join a class of living that's reserved for attorneys and accountants and other people who've snaked their way through letting the system work for them. But my adjunct professor is also right. Somehow, in making school and university something that everyone can do, the whole thing has changed. The process has "dumbed" down in a weird way, and now college is the new high school, grad school is the new college, etc. This is something everyone knows.

Who's fault is it that some people get to go to universities, and other people get degree factories called Universities? Is it the University, for having what would traditionally be considered low standards? Or is it the people in the beginning, who decided that monetary wealth should be the decided factor on who gets to go to college and who gets to work?

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Reflection on my first essay

So I realize that my first essay had some problems. For one, my personal stories aren't long enough. I felt like I spent a long time, but reading it over they're not nearly long enough. I also feel like they have a sort of "homily" quality to them which I really don't like. Was I meant for the priesthood? Please, no!

I feel like my essay needs more. If this were a paper, I'd feel like I need to hit up the library and do some more research.

This is probably my fault, but I came into this class assuming "Creative Nonfiction" was something like journalism, and that's clearly not the case.

I guess there are a few things I did right, though. I feel kinda optimistic about my topic, though, and think that if I focus on it again I can do better. I can probably be a little bit more personal, and focused now because I've already written the story before.

I guess I'll update this more after my talk with Dr. Chandler.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Draft

The Language of Lies
by: Joseph Tingle

Unusual as it may be, I rely on the Muses of the world of rap, rock and heavy metal to draw inspiration for this personal essay, which I apologize for in advance as it's probably little more than a glorified free-write. Maynard Keenan and Tool have the stage:

We all feed on tragedy.
It's like blood to a vampire.


Now, lyricist, singer, wine-maker, political commentator, and amateur actor Maynard Keenan and cronies make a “good” though tragically-obsessed point. What is it? I'll get back to that.

When I lived in Chicago, a friend of mine from high school named “Dave” met a girl he was interested in. At one-hundred and some pounds overweight, Dave wasn't exactly what most women would consider “attractive.” Dave, of course, had an excellent personality, was thoughtful, sympathetic, easy to talk to, artistic, a “deep thinker” but not an athlete. One day, Dave met a cute (warning: high school terminology on the way) “gothic” girl in fishnets and a black skirt who fit his idea of beauty, and they began eating lunch together, talking on aim and the phone, going to concerts, and whatever else. This person loved talking and being with Dave, as people usually did. But what happened when the question of sex came up (it's inevitable between men and women, isn't it?)

This girl told Dave that she liked “guys who had problems,” and “people who lived on the fringe.”

Ah, classic representations of the pre-packaged, punk-rock sentiments on sale for $22.49 a tee at Hot-Topic. Unfortunately, it was only a couple days later when Dave told me that he didn't believe in God, thought he might be bipolar, and “always kinda thought he might have been molested as a child.”

Why did this person tell him these things? Was it to brush-off a “nice” but traditionally unattractive person? Or was she telling the truth? Or was it a combination of things?
The age of self-esteem tells us that we should be happy with ourselves, and that we shouldn't be afraid to be different. Eminem:

Don't let 'em say you ain't beautiful.
They can all get f---ed. Just stay true to you.


I used to write for an alternative newspaper named The Steaming Pipe. The Pipe started as a campus paper in the vein of the Medium or the old Village Voice, slowly grew into a local paper, then finally a multi-university arts magazine before imploding. Like Eminem, the paper flaunted itself as a source of controversy. It made liberal use of the word f---, and made sure that you knew it did so for some vague, counter-reactionary reason reminiscent of colonial pamphleteering.

When the University's Student Organization had problems with it's electronic voting system and had to postpone the election, the Pipe reported with the semantic accuracy attainable only by English majors “Student Org. Fixes Election.” When I wrote an article about how Student Organization was purchasing a lobby from the University for 1.3 million dollars, I stood by silently as the editor abrasively but accurately titled my story “Student Org gives 1.3 million to school.”

As it turned out, I wasn't artsy or edgy enough for the Pipe, and left as it turned into a full-fledged alternative arts magazine.

What is it? The people who write are the people who feel they have something to communicate. More often than not, the people who have something to communicate are the same who are somehow unsatisfied, negative, “deep thinkers” who have been through something life-changing. But writing is a sincere practice, isn't it? Where is the sincerity in exaggeration? Where is the sincerity is pretending to be “deep?” Where is the sincerity in over-dramatizing?

When I was younger, my best friend's dad had a drinking problem. Though he was never hit by his dad, he constantly felt like he was being verbally abused, unable to meet the expectations of that person. Resentment for his father grew and grew, until he dropped out of college and moved out of the house at the age of nineteen.

Though their relationship is now probably better than it's ever been, his perception of his father has traditionally been a negative one. He sees his father as a unfaithful boozer, an opportunist, an abuser and is tormented by his memory of him daily.

I see his father as I see my own, an imperfect, old fashioned human being who has made tons of mistakes, but nearly always attempts to do the “right thing” if not right away then at least eventually.

We're brothers, but we have different fathers. My mother, on the other hand, sees them both. There's parts of both of us in her.

Sometimes, I feel that I could dig up my brother's or some other poor soul's torment, and make it my own. Sometimes, I feel that I need to sensationalize my own experience, act generally unhappy, or lived some kind of fantastic life to be a writer. But that isn't true, is it? Where is the sincerity in that?

Society tells us it's okay to be ourselves, but somewhere, for some reason, writers make us feel like we have to have emotional scars to be noteworthy, to sell. Why is this? Is it about the combination of our hippie parent's self-esteem doctrine and the super-individuality emphasis of American capitalism that makes us feel like we have to be scared of tradition and “normal-ness” to be heard?

To be noticed, we need to stand out from the group. To stand out from the group, we need to have some kind of noticeable scar, real or invented. Writing is one of the oldest means in which people have attempted to reach immortality.

As humans, we love drama, especially the kind that we don't have to be a part of. And sometimes we'll go as far as to sensationalize the mundane in order to experience a little bit of that drama if we have to, because that makes us “deep,” and “special,” sets us apart from the group and gives us something to write about, occasionally by throwing sincerity to the fire. After all, that's what sells.

Maybe being yourself doesn't have to included acting deep, or like you have a cross to bear, or shooting an elephant like Orwell. As another band, dredg, tell us:

All you need is a modest house
in a modest neighborhood
in a modest town where honest people dwell.

Making the cleanest energy
for the greenest plants to grow,
the richest soil
that is wet with the freshest rain.

Then, you can sit in your backyard,
and watch stars come over the tallest mountaintop
because they unveil honest opinions about the stars.


Only language can tell lies.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

The truth, lies, and "The Truth"

So, sometimes you can tell a lie to get at a greater, capital-T "Truth." That, essentially, is the point of O'Brien's essay and according to him, the point of a good war story. But how does this happen?

It reminds me of the movie Platoon. That movie isn't based on a true story, and no real platoon in Vietnam had an experience as terrible as that one, but the movie manages to include all the terrible things about Vietnam in one film. The film manages to tell the "true" Vietnam story without actually telling a true story.

Can I think of anything similar?

A lot of creative nonfiction seems this way. Not necessarily true, but at the same time very True. I wonder, though, how untrue something can be before it stops being nonfiction? If I wrote a story about my family, and everyone read it and said "but I never did that!" would it be O.K. as long as it expressed some general Truth? This just occurred to me: Is James Joyce's "Dubliners" and "Portrait of the Artists as a Young Man" creative nonfiction, or even some kind of early precursor? Is any semi-autobiographical work creative nonfiction? What about Tobias Wolff's "Old School" some kind of creative nonfiction?

Is this even relevant? Damn me, I'm such a discussion de-railer.